A depiction of cross references in the Bible |
In our blog, up to this point, we have travelled a
wide breadth of Scripture.
At the very
beginning, creation itself, we found that God chose humanity, not because of
their glory, but because of their weakness, compared to the other “gods” He had
as options to rule the world. We also
looked at how God chose the weak and helpless to uphold so that He could be
seen as the One with strength. God’s
help, we saw in Psalm 146 is for all the poor, to grant them food and to
deliver them from oppression. And from
Samuel’s mother, Hannah, we learned how it is God’s plan to raise the poor from
the dust to no smaller place than the top of the heap of humanity. And, finally, we saw how Jesus actually chose
the poor to make up his school, as an indicator of who would enter into God’s
kingdom. The anawim are the apple of
God’s eye, the focus of His salvation.
What Jesus didn't say |
Yet
we look at our churches today, and they don’t reflect God’s vision in this
way. In many ways, we indicate that the
poor are separated from God’s people, not the heart of it. In many churches,
they see a “spirit of poverty” as a form of oppression. Of course, poverty is a limitation, a
difficulty, but it is just as much a symbol of blessing as it is a kind of
oppression. In testimonies and stories
of the church, we talk about poverty as something we used to have, but have
been delivered from. This implies that
God’s true people aren’t people burdened by poverty. It has been an assumption
and often a bold theological point that God’s blessing and sign of approval is
to be wealthy or at least living a middle class lifestyle. Yet Jesus declared the poor to be blessed and
to be God’s people.
The
church is a culture as well as a spiritual people. And the culture of 99 percent of American
churches is the culture of the middle class who have the next level in the
social order as their goal. Our church
leaders usually want to fill their churches with suburbanites instead of single
moms with drug babies.
The
poorest of the poor are not found to darken our door—the homeless, mentally
ill, panhandlers, illegal immigrants, itinerant farm workers, sufferers from
AIDS. And this is not because we do not
welcome them. It is because they see the
culture of the church as being different from the culture that they live
with. To be a part of the church, for
them is to be converted, not to a spiritual reality, but a social and ethical
system which is unknown to them.
When
our churches do talk about the poor, it is about ministry ‘to’ the poor, not
being ‘of’ the poor. We are seen as the
people who are wealthy who need to assist, help, save, deliver, feed, clothe or
house the poor. Even in this, the poor
are on the outside of the church and the church is “reaching out” to them. Why?
Because in our hearts, we know that we don’t commune with the poor. They aren’t a part of us.
The religion that began as a
gathering of the poor, now finds itself locked out of the blessing God offers
to the poor. We are outside of many of
the promises of Jesus because, frankly, we don’t need them. We pray the Lord’s prayer regularly, but we
don’t really mean that we want God’s kingdom to come, because that would mean
that the economics and society that our current salvation is found would have
to be set aside. We don’t really need to
pray for our daily bread because we have our refrigerators full of this month’s
food. And, often, we don’t see God as
our deliverer, because we have so many resources at our fingertips.
We need to seriously consider the
option that our churches feel empty of the Spirit, seem devoid of life, have
pews filled with air more than bodies because we have stopped taking God
seriously as a means of salvation. If we
refuse poverty, how will God gain the glory of delivering the poor? If we no longer are the needy, then how will
God grant our needs? Yes, we are
responsible, we are strong, we care for those we have to take of. But will God be found among a people who
speak His glory, but never reach out for it, never live it out in their lives?
No comments:
Post a Comment